The old logo will always be the best. The new one sucks.…
The Old Logo Will Always Be the Best. The New One Sucks.
Logos are more than just images; they are symbols of identity, tradition, and emotion. When a company, sports team, or organization changes its logo, it often sparks strong reactions from fans and consumers. In many cases, the old logo carries a sense of nostalgia, history, and authenticity that a new design simply cannot replicate.
Unfortunately, many redesigns fail to capture the essence of what made the original logo great. Instead of improving on a classic, companies often opt for simplified, generic, and uninspired designs that strip away character. This is why so many people feel that the old logo will always be the best, while the new one sucks.
Nostalgia and Emotional Connection
One of the biggest reasons people prefer old logos is nostalgia. A logo isn’t just an image—it represents memories, experiences, and personal connections. Whether it’s a sports team you’ve followed since childhood, a brand you’ve trusted for years, or a company that played a role in your life, the old logo becomes a part of your identity.
When a company changes its logo, it feels like a piece of history is being erased. Fans feel a deep emotional connection to the old design, and no amount of modern rebranding can replace that.
Over-Simplification Ruins Logos
Another common issue with new logos is that they are often over-simplified to the point of being unrecognizable. Many companies are obsessed with “modernizing” their image by stripping away details, unique typography, or iconic elements.
Look at some of the biggest logo redesign failures in recent years:
•Gap (2010) – The brand attempted to replace its timeless blue box logo with a bland, forgettable design. Backlash was so strong that the company reverted to the old logo within a week.
•Tropicana (2009) – The orange juice brand removed its famous straw-in-the-orange design, making its packaging look generic. Sales dropped by 20% in just two months, forcing the company to return to the original look.
•Pepsi (2008) – The new logo tried to mimic Coca-Cola’s sleek branding but ended up looking awkward and unbalanced. To this day, many fans still prefer the classic 90s Pepsi globe.
These examples prove that simplification isn’t always better. A good logo should be memorable, distinctive, and reflective of the brand’s personality—not just a bland, corporate-looking symbol.
If It’s Not Broken, Don’t Fix It
Many companies justify logo changes by saying they want to “modernize” or “refresh” their brand. But if a logo is iconic and beloved, there is no reason to change it. The best logos stand the test of time—think of Nike, McDonald’s, or Apple. These brands understand the value of consistency, and their logos have remained largely unchanged for decades.
Conclusion
The old logo is always the best because it represents history, character, and emotional connection. Too often, companies chase trends instead of honoring their legacy, resulting in uninspired redesigns that fail to capture the original magic. While change can sometimes be good, not all change is necessary—especially when it comes to a logo that people love.